The skyrocketing cost of hardware, dubbed the "RAMpocalypse," may be more than just a result of organic demand driven by artificial intelligence. A new federal class-action lawsuit filed in California accuses the world's three largest memory manufacturers — Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron — of deliberately manipulating supply to artificially inflate DRAM prices.
AI Demand as a Cover for Scarcity
According to the complaint, these three companies, which control nearly 90% of the global market, coordinated a strategy to restrict the supply of consumer-grade memory (DDR3 and DDR4). The lawsuit alleges that the manufacturers used the industry shift toward High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), critical for AI data centers, as a pretext to curtail conventional RAM production.This alleged manipulation has contributed to price surges estimated between 500% and 700% over the last four years. Legal representatives argue that this behavior defies economic logic, pointing to Micron's decision to shut down its consumer-facing Crucial DRAM business at what was claimed to be its most profitable point in history.
Impact on Consumer Electronics
The ripple effects are evident across the consumer electronics sector. Major players including Apple, Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo have raised hardware prices to offset the rising cost of memory. The lawsuit claims that this artificial scarcity has forced retailers and OEMs into a corner, benefiting the chipmakers' bottom lines while penalizing end-users.Market Barriers and Legal History
The filing emphasizes that the DRAM market is an oligopoly protected by immense barriers to entry. Establishing a new fabrication plant requires capital investments of $15 billion to $20 billion, making it nearly impossible for new competitors to enter and stabilize pricing. Furthermore, the lawsuit recalls a criminal conspiracy involving these same companies between 1998 and 2002 regarding DRAM price-fixing.Market analysts suggest that relief may not arrive until 2028, as new production capacity is expected to come online only then, leaving consumers and manufacturers vulnerable to price volatility in the interim.
